Peer review is a process used by CIHR to review applications submitted for funding. Applications are evaluated by reviewers who are experts in the same field (i.e., peers of the applicants), and their recommendations are used by CIHR to make funding decisions. Peer review is the internationally accepted benchmark for ensuring quality and excellence in scientific research.

CIHR relies on peer review to ensure its mandate to excel, according to internationally accepted standards, in the creation of new knowledge and its translation into:

• Improved health for Canadians
• More effective health services and products
• A strengthened Canadian health-care system

CIHR invites experts from the health research community to become members of Peer Review Committees (PRCs). In accordance with best practices employed by major international funding agencies, PRCs:

• Evaluate applications submitted for a particular funding opportunity
• Rate them on their merit using a defined set of evaluation criteria so they can be ranked by CIHR in order of priority for funding
• Recommend the funds needed to support the research

PRCs make recommendations for funding to the Chief Scientific Officer and Chief Financial Officer, which in turn make recommendations to Scientific Council (SC); SC provides final approval.

For more information on how CIHR manages and oversees peer review, please see Management of Peer Review.

Principles of Peer Review

The integrity of the peer review process relies on well established principles and policies that:

• Ensure fair and effective evaluation
• Support CIHR objectives and strategic funding targets

CIHR Principles of Peer Review:

• Confidentiality
• Absence of conflict of interest
• Fairness

For general information about Principles of Peer Review relating to grants, please see Principles of Peer Review in the CIHR Peer Review Manual for Grant Applications; for information relating to awards, please see General Considerations in the Policies and Responsibilities of Awards Committee Members.

For specific details on confidentiality and conflict of interest, please see CIHR's Policy on Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality in the Context of Merit, Relevance and Peer Review (CCIP).

Specialized Review Processes

For specific funding opportunities, CIHR has tailored the peer review process to ensure that funded applications meet strategic program objectives:

Merit Review

Merit Review specifies separate scores for scientific merit and potential impact. For more information, please see Merit Review.

Relevance Review

Relevance Review is used to ensure that the objectives of the applications align with the objectives of the funding opportunity.

For more information on the assessment of your application, please see the Review Process and Evaluation section in the relevant Funding Opportunity Details.